Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 00535
Original file (BC 2007 00535.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00535 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect his overseas duty and his 
awards and decorations. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect his overseas service in 
the Republic of Korea or any of the awards and decorations he 
earned from said service. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s military personnel records were apparently 
located in the area most heavily damaged in the fire at the 
National Personnel Records Center in 1973. Documents provided 
by the applicant indicate that he enlisted in the Regular Air 
Force on 16 June 1954 and served on active duty until he was 
honorably discharged on 6 December 1957 and credited with 
3 years, 5 months, and 21 days of total active service. 

 

On 23 March 2007, the applicant was notified that his records 
were likely destroyed in the aforementioned fire at NPRC and 
asked to provide copies of any documents in his possession that 
could be helpful in adjudicating his instant request. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is insufficient 
documentation to verify the applicant’s eligibility for Korean 
service awards. The Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is 
awarded to service members who have been permanently assigned, 


attached, or detailed to a unit that operated within the area of 
eligibility and must have been physically deployed in the area 
if eligibility for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days; 
however, there is insufficient documentation to verify applicant 
was in the area of eligibility for Korean service awards. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 14 December 2012, for review and comment within 30 
days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim or an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sough in this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2007-00535 in Executive Session on 23 April 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 August 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 19 November 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 December 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04920

    Original file (BC-2012-04920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSID states that there is no documentation verifying the applicant served in Korea; therefore, he is not eligible based on the governing Department of Defense (DoD) instructions. The applicant provides a letter from a former servicemember indicating that they served together at Osan Air Base, Korea. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00545

    Original file (BC 2013 00545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    They also recommend denial of the AFOR-ST, indicating the applicant separated from active duty several years before the AFOR was authorized; therefore he is not qualified for this award. The applicant provided travel orders for travel to Japan from APO 970, which DPSID verified as Korea dated 11 Mar 57, and a supply form dated 26 Jul 57, issuing him an M-1 Carbine; however, the travel voucher which authenticates the travel order and details exact dates and locations the applicant served...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02937

    Original file (BC-2012-02937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02937 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Global War on Terrorism - Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He deployed after 9/11 in support of Operation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05532

    Original file (BC 2012 05532.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served four years of total active duty service. DPSIDR states that the applicant’s official military records were thoroughly reviewed; however, they were unable to locate documentation to verify he served in the area of eligibility for the required period of time for award of the KDSM. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02163

    Original file (BC 2013 02163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02163 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Korean Service Medal (KSM) and Air Force Crew Wings. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04024

    Original file (BC-2012-04024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04024 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he went temporary duty (TDY) to Camron [sic] Bay, South Vietnam for 53 days and that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05562

    Original file (BC 2013 05562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In addition, he provides a personal note to the Board in which he claims he followed the travel orders, but the units he was assigned to at Kirtland Air Force Base, NM and Korea have both been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03501

    Original file (BC-2012-03501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. The Cold War Certificate recognizes members of the Armed Forces and civilian personnel of the United States Government who served the United States during the Cold War. DPSID states the applicant should contact the Department of the Army to obtain a Cold War Certificate for his service during the specified time period at the website or address provided.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04187

    Original file (BC-2012-04187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    To qualify, a service member must have actually participated as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations, or have served on temporary duty (TDY) for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02127

    Original file (BC-2012-02127.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 September 1986, he was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service and credited with completing 3 years, 11 months, and 23 days of active duty service. However, they believe the applicant is requesting award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for service in support of operations in Grenada. He states his unit was awarded the AFEM but he was told he could not receive the medal because he did not have two years of service and would receive the...